On 18/3/26 18:55, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 at 18:31, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/3/26 13:21, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 2:18 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> What is the reason for the second change? Tender, can you show us how to
>>>> reproduce the issue so we can support your update to
>>>> restrict_infos_logically_equal? If we include it, we should add a test.
>>>
>>> I think Tender already shown this in [1]. The same qual is present
>>> twice in the plan.
>> Got it. I suggest making this a separate commit to keep the history
>> clear. Let me share a draft with a test case for the bug fix first.
> Hi!
> Is `cool_bool` a typo of `col_bool` in regression test ?
This is actually a happy coincidence, not a typo. We made this mistake
during initial development because I didn't realise that a boolean
operation on a bool variable is never wrapped in an expression
structure. It's a 'cool' example that shows a rare edge case.
> And the patch seems to have forgotten to add "Reported by".
Yeah, let the committer manage the award part.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge