> On Jun 10, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> […] but it'd be better to adjust the query to ensure a deterministic
> update order.
Thank you for the answer. Since `update` has no `order by` clause, I’m guessing there’s no way to do this with just the
`update`statement, and that I should use `select … order by … for update’ for this.
