On 10/21/20 18:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the reason we've not had complaints about this is that the
> situation normally doesn't arise in interactive sessions (since we
> won't release the old connection voluntarily), while scripts are
> likely not designed to cope with connection losses anyway. These
> facts militate against spending a whole lot of effort on a fix,
> but still we ought to reduce the silliness factor. What I propose
> is to complain if we have no o_conn *and* we are asked to re-use
> parameters from it. Otherwise, it's fine.
I've been getting around it just by saying
\c "connstring" . . .
which works. It gives me a tiny thrill every time I do it, like I'm
getting away with something. Which is why I haven't been complaining.
I suppose I wouldn't complain if it were fixed, either.
Regards,
-Chap
