Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN
Date
Msg-id 5EAB9329-C42C-4B22-B296-B1EC7C483CA0@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On May 18, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> If I include both version 1 and version 2 of an extension in one. And
> version 2 has more dependencies than version 1 (or the other way
> around). Then those dependencies will be required for version 1 as
> well...

Yes. But if they're that decoupled, then they ought to be in separate distributions.

Best,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN