Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Pye
Subject Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date
Msg-id 5E030568-FC05-4B79-BDF8-6CBF0F882DC0@jwp.name
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:48 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> I'd like to see pseudo-types like ANYNUMERIC, and allow it to take an
> array decorator, which would really help for math-ish functions.  Not
> sure where that fits in this discussion.

Perhaps typcategory could be leveraged here?


..Tho, if I understand the general direction, I think it would be  
along the lines of type classes/interfaces..


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: CTE bug?