Re: Back-branch bugs with fully-prunable UPDATEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Back-branch bugs with fully-prunable UPDATEs
Date
Msg-id 5CAAB9B7.3060800@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Back-branch bugs with fully-prunable UPDATEs  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2019/04/07 16:54), Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:28 AM Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>  wrote:

>> This seems to be related to what Amit Langote complained of in
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21e7eaa4-0d4d-20c2-a1f7-c7e96f4ce440@lab.ntt.co.jp
>> but since there's no foreign tables involved at all, either it's
>> a different bug or he misdiagnosed what he was seeing.
>
> I think that one is a different bug, but maybe I haven't looked closely enough.

I started working on that from last Friday (though I didn't work on the 
weekend).  I agree on Amit's reasoning stated in that post, and I think 
that that's my fault.  Sorry for the delay.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time