Re: Oddity with parallel safety test for scan/join target in grouping_planner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Oddity with parallel safety test for scan/join target in grouping_planner
Date
Msg-id 5C7908B9.5070407@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oddity with parallel safety test for scan/join target in grouping_planner  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Oddity with parallel safety test for scan/join target in grouping_planner
List pgsql-hackers
(2019/02/28 0:52), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:26 AM Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>  wrote:
>> The parallel safety of the final scan/join target is determined from the
>> grouping target, not that target, which [ is wrong ]

> Your patch looks right to me.

I think it would be better for you to take this one.  Could you?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Unneeded parallel safety tests in grouping_planner
Next
From: Martín Marqués
Date:
Subject: Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation