Re: House style for DocBook documentation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Date
Msg-id 5C461B32.8020403@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: House style for DocBook documentation?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/21/19 13:14, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Of course, the text would also be clickable, right?  I think putting the
>> URL in a footnote is good in that case; it works both on screen and on
>> paper, which should alleviate JD's concerns.
> 
> Yeah I could see that. I thought about that but was wondering if it was

It looks like the easiest way to integrate such a behavior into the
current Makefile would be not as a separate DocBook->DocBook transform
in advance, but simply by editing the existing stylesheet-fo.xsl that
produces the FO input for generating the PDF.

That would mean learning some FO, which I've wanted to do for a while,
but haven't yet, so it stops looking like something I might experiment
with this afternoon. OTOH, it could mean more flexibility in how the
presentation should look.

I note in passing that the google result [1] is nonempty....

-Chap

[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=xsl-fo+qr+code


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: What to name the current heap after pluggable storage / what torename?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: should ConstraintRelationId ins/upd cause relcache invals?