(2018/06/11 20:34), Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 07:08 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> In one of those cases, "ConvertRowtypeExpr reference errors from
>>> partition-wise join", the patch has been marked Ready for Committer and
>>> then Etsuro seems to have changeed his mind. If it's not ready it should
>>> be set back to "needs review" or "waiting for author".
>>
>> Yeah, I don't think the proposed patch is the right way to go, so I'm
>> proposing another solution for that, which I think makes code much
>> simple, but I'd like to hear the opinion from Robert, who is the owner
>> of PWJ. (I marked this as Ready for Committer partly because I wanted
>> to hear the opinion.)
>
> I don't think that's the way we should use "Ready for Committer". I
> suggest you ,move it back to "Needs Review".
Done.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
