Re: postgres_fdw: Oddity in pushing down inherited UPDATE/DELETEjoins to remote servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: postgres_fdw: Oddity in pushing down inherited UPDATE/DELETEjoins to remote servers
Date
Msg-id 5AFC0ADE.3000807@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw: Oddity in pushing down inherited UPDATE/DELETEjoins to remote servers  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2018/05/16 18:40), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/05/16 18:35, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> I don't object to back-patching.  Should I remove this from the open
>> items list for PG11?
> 
> Perhaps, keep on the page but in Older Bugs section?

OK, I'll move to Older Bugs on that page and add to the next commitfest.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backwardindex paths