(2018/05/11 16:19), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/05/11 16:12, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Just to clarify, does this problem only arise because there is a pushed
>> down join involving the child? That is, does the problem only occur as of
>> the following commit:
>>
>> commit 1bc0100d270e5bcc980a0629b8726a32a497e788
>> Author: Robert Haas<rhaas@postgresql.org>
>> Date: Wed Feb 7 15:34:30 2018 -0500
>>
>> postgres_fdw: Push down UPDATE/DELETE joins to remote servers.
>>
>> In other words, do we need to back-patch this up to 9.5 which added
>> foreign table inheritance?
>
> Oops, it should have been clear by the subject line that the problem
> didn't exist before that commit. Sorry.
No. In theory, I think we could consider this as an older bug added in
9.5, because in case of inherited UPDATE/DELETE, the PlannerInfo passed
to PlanForeignModify doesn't match the one the FDW saw at Path creation
time, as you mentioned in a previous email, while in case of
non-inherited UPDATE/DELETE, the PlannerInfo passed to that function
matches the one the FDW saw at that time. I think that's my fault :(.
But considering there seems to be no field reports on that, I don't
think we need back-patching up to 9.5.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
