Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions
Date
Msg-id 5AE17541.7000806@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2018/04/26 15:39), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/04/26 15:27, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Here is a new version I'd like to propose for fixing this issue without
>> the former patch.

> Sorry, didn't notice this before sending my patch, which I also marked v7.
>
> It's a bit different than yours and has comments with excerpts from your
> earlier versions.  See if you find it helpful.

OK, will review your version.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?