On 04/06/18 20:19, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 04/06/18 19:52, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be a better idea not to have a list there, that's guaranteed
>> to get out of date?
>
> That might look like this, then.
>
> But I'm not sure how bad it is to have a list. How often does ResourceOwner
> get taught a new type? It took nine years to grow these last three.
It also seemed worth documenting that the release callbacks are called
for *every* ResourceOwnerRelease, but can consult CurrentResourceOwner to
learn what owner is really being released.
-Chap
