Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date
Msg-id 5ABEC2C0.5040207@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 03/30/18 16:21, Tom Lane wrote:

> Yup.  Pushed with some rewriting of the comments.

Thanks!

> I did not like the proposed test case too much, particularly not its
> undocumented API change for check_pg_config,

Other than that API change, was there something the test case could have
done differently to make you like it more?

-Chap

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Passing current_database to BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.