Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date
Msg-id 5AAEFF11.3070903@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/18/18 19:28, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> It seems expensive to regex over BLCKSZ, but it’s probably the safest option
> and it’s not a performance critical codepath.  Feel free to whack the test
> patch over the head with the above diff.

Both patches in a single email for cfbot's enjoyment, coming right up.

-Chap

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Flexible permissions for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW