(2018/02/08 10:40), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The buildfarm's opinion of it is lower than yours. Just eyeballing
>> the failures, I'd say there was some naivete about the reproducibility
>> of tuple CTIDs across different platforms. Is there a good reason
>> these test cases need to print CTID?
>
> Uggh, I missed the fact that they were doing that. It's probably
> actually useful test coverage, but it's not surprising that it isn't
> stable.
That was my purpose, but I agree with the instability. Thanks again,
Robert!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
