(2018/01/17 22:00), Stephen Frost wrote:
> Reviewing this thread, I tend to agree with Etsuro and I'm not sure I
> see where there's a good argument for having a foreign table under a
> view behave differently than a local table under a view for WCO (which
> is an option of the view- not about the table underneath it or if it's
> local or remote). I've not done a detailed review of the patch but it
> seems pretty reasonable and pretty small.
Thanks for the comments!
I noticed the patch doesn't apply. Attached is a rebased patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
