Re: Remove deprecated role membership options from psql help for CREATE USER/GROUP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chao Li
Subject Re: Remove deprecated role membership options from psql help for CREATE USER/GROUP
Date
Msg-id 5A39E825-95E5-40E9-98DC-22D89240B39F@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Remove deprecated role membership options from psql help for CREATE USER/GROUP  (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: Remove deprecated role membership options from psql help for CREATE USER/GROUP
List pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 6, 2026, at 18:16, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When I review [1], I found commit 8e78f0a1 deprecated the IN GROUP and USER
> clauses in CREATE ROLE, and also removed IN GROUP and USER from the psql \h
> CREATE ROLE help output.
>
> However, the psql help for the legacy synonyms CREATE USER and CREATE GROUP
> still lists the deprecated options:
>
> - IN GROUP role_name [, ...]
> - USER role_name [, ...]
>
> postgres=# \h create role
> Command:     CREATE ROLE
> Description: define a new database role
> Syntax:
> CREATE ROLE name [ [ WITH ] option [ ... ] ]
>
> where option can be:
>
>      SUPERUSER | NOSUPERUSER
>    | CREATEDB | NOCREATEDB
>    | CREATEROLE | NOCREATEROLE
>    | INHERIT | NOINHERIT
>    | LOGIN | NOLOGIN
>    | REPLICATION | NOREPLICATION
>    | BYPASSRLS | NOBYPASSRLS
>    | CONNECTION LIMIT connlimit
>    | [ ENCRYPTED ] PASSWORD 'password' | PASSWORD NULL
>    | VALID UNTIL 'timestamp'
>    | IN ROLE role_name [, ...]
>    | ROLE role_name [, ...]
>    | ADMIN role_name [, ...]
>    | SYSID uid
>
> URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-createrole.html
>
> postgres=# \h create user
> Command:     CREATE USER
> Description: define a new database role
> Syntax:
> CREATE USER name [ [ WITH ] option [ ... ] ]
>
> where option can be:
>
>      SUPERUSER | NOSUPERUSER
>    | CREATEDB | NOCREATEDB
>    | CREATEROLE | NOCREATEROLE
>    | INHERIT | NOINHERIT
>    | LOGIN | NOLOGIN
>    | REPLICATION | NOREPLICATION
>    | BYPASSRLS | NOBYPASSRLS
>    | CONNECTION LIMIT connlimit
>    | [ ENCRYPTED ] PASSWORD 'password' | PASSWORD NULL
>    | VALID UNTIL 'timestamp'
>    | IN ROLE role_name [, ...]
>    | IN GROUP role_name [, ...]
>    | ROLE role_name [, ...]
>    | ADMIN role_name [, ...]
>    | USER role_name [, ...]
>    | SYSID uid
>
> URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-createuser.html
>
> postgres=# \h create group
> Command:     CREATE GROUP
> Description: define a new database role
> Syntax:
> CREATE GROUP name [ [ WITH ] option [ ... ] ]
>
> where option can be:
>
>      SUPERUSER | NOSUPERUSER
>    | CREATEDB | NOCREATEDB
>    | CREATEROLE | NOCREATEROLE
>    | INHERIT | NOINHERIT
>    | LOGIN | NOLOGIN
>    | REPLICATION | NOREPLICATION
>    | BYPASSRLS | NOBYPASSRLS
>    | CONNECTION LIMIT connlimit
>    | [ ENCRYPTED ] PASSWORD 'password' | PASSWORD NULL
>    | VALID UNTIL 'timestamp'
>    | IN ROLE role_name [, ...]
>    | IN GROUP role_name [, ...]
>    | ROLE role_name [, ...]
>    | ADMIN role_name [, ...]
>    | USER role_name [, ...]
>    | SYSID uid
>
> URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-creategroup.html
>
> Since CREATE USER is documented as equivalent to CREATE ROLE WITH LOGIN, and
> CREATE GROUP is equivalent to CREATE ROLE, their help syntax should remain
> consistent with CREATE ROLE.
>
> I propose removing the deprecated IN GROUP and USER lines from the help text
> of both CREATE USER and CREATE GROUP. This would be a simple documentation
> cleanup that aligns the psql help with current reality and avoids confusing
> users with obsolete syntax.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4c5f895e-3281-48f8-b943-9228b7da6471%40gmail.com
>
> --
> Regards,
> Japin Li
> ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
>
> <v1-0001-Remove-deprecated-role-options-for-CREATE-USER-GR.patch>


```
This commit removes the deprecated IN GROUP and USER lines from the psql
help output for CREATE USER and CREATE GROUP.
```

The commit message claims to remove things from psql help output, but the change actually updated the SGML docs. Does
thepatch miss the change on psql? 

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplify code building the LR conflict messages