Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Christopher Petrilli
Subject Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB
Date
Msg-id 59d991c40512020550k3bffd5eavf30a515f1f5dba90@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 12/1/05, Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Well, reading the changelog history apparently they call 5.0.15 from
> > Oct.19th "Release", so all previous versions were Beta. I wonder how
> > many MySQL 5.0 users are aware of that...
>
> Er ... hmmmm ... so that means they have happy feature mucking during
> BETA? This is unprofessional. BETA phase without feature freeze ... what
> kind of hobby coders did they hire?

The issue for me, personally, is that it can often be nearly
impossible to know if 5.0.15 is actually a release code, or if it's
beta. In addition, it's nearly impossible to know if 5.0.14 and 5.0.15
are "compatible".  I'm still old-school, and believe that .z releases
should *never* introduce new functionality. That's a .y release.

For me, it's just a demonstration of sloppy practices in release
management. Honestly, MySQL just has too damned many releases.

Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| petrilli@gmail.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1 pdf