Re: A Bug in outDatum ?? (Not Sure ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: A Bug in outDatum ?? (Not Sure )
Date
Msg-id 5995.1269740828@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to A Bug in outDatum ?? (Not Sure )  (Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com> writes:
>    The function outDatum doesn't take care of varlena structures which are
> stored externally. Is it the intention??

For its use for debugging purposes, this is a preferable behavior: it
shows you what's actually there.  For its use for storing rule trees,
it doesn't matter, because the case must never arise.  A toasted value
in a rule's Const node would be disastrous for other reasons: there'd be
no way to ensure the referenced toast value doesn't disappear while the
rule is in use.  (We've actually had bugs of that ilk; note the forced
detoast in evaluate_expr().)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Augment WAL records for btree delete with GetOldestXmin() to
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: plpgsql's case bug?