Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Date
Msg-id 5973.1242063721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
> Would the "lock_timeout" work for all to be acquired locks individually,
> or all of them combined for the statement? The individual application
> of the timeout for every locks individually wouldn't be too nice.

I think the way you're describing would be both harder to implement
and full of its own strange traps.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Next
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5