On Oct 25, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ken Geis <kgeis@speakeasy.net> writes:
>> The problem came up for me because I am implementing binary
>> data transfer in the JDBC driver, and my first draft assumes that all
>> data transfers are binary.
>
> This is a really bad assumption, unless you intend never to support any
> user-defined types.
Yes, I know. That's why I said "first draft." My goal is to hack
together a driver that works in most cases and gets the community to
realize that binary data transfer is great and the JDBC driver needs
some active development.
Ken
