Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Migrating from 8.2 to 9.1 : invalid port number - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Migrating from 8.2 to 9.1 : invalid port number
Date
Msg-id 5970.1337790833@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Migrating from 8.2 to 9.1 : invalid port number  (Alberto Zanon <alberto.zanon@edistar.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
Alberto Zanon <alberto.zanon@edistar.com> writes:
> I agree with you about the concept of "port number". I only wanted to know if it is a new behavior of Postgresql 9.1.


More like 9.0, according to our commit logs:

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL9_0_BR [61be11ff0] 2009-09-27 03:43:10 +0000

    Make libpq reject non-numeric and out-of-range port numbers with a suitable
    error message, rather than blundering on and failing with something opaque.

    Sam Mason

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock file "postmaster.pid" already exists
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: significant performance hit whenever autovacuum runs after upgrading from 9.0 -> 9.1