Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
Date
Msg-id 59452d80-0a86-4872-a351-062a057e74f4@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage  (Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 05/04/2026 15:31, Lukas Fittl wrote:
> Heikki, your further review is very welcome, if you have the time.
> It'd also be great if you could review the README.instrument (now in
> v13/0008) to see if that makes sense to you.

I don't have very substantial comments to make, an haven't had a chance 
to review the latest patch, but I did read your replies. I think I 
understand the stack vs. tree model now and why it is the way it is, but 
I still find it pretty confusing and I don't know what to about it.

- Heikki

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicate RequestNamedLWLocktranche() names and test_lwlock_tranches improvements