Re: inet/cidr type comparisons - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: inet/cidr type comparisons
Date
Msg-id 5910.992284392@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inet/cidr type comparisons  (Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>)
Responses Re: inet/cidr type comparisons  (Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org> writes:
> while you are in there, can you cahnge the print functions so that they
> are consistent?

I believe they are consistent in 7.1; leastwise, you will have to make
a pretty good argument why we should change them again.  We had a very
long discussion that led up to the current solution.

There are formatting functions that provide various alternative displays
if you don't like the default one, btw.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: Re: inet/cidr type comparisons
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: OID Wrap