Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices.
Date
Msg-id 5901.1393943205@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Hello, I examined the your patch and it seemed reasonable, but I
> have one question about this patch.

> You made ec_relids differ to the union of all ec members'
> em_relids. Is it right?

ec_relids has never included child relids.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t