Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alan Hodgson
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date
Msg-id 5844936.6QBLzj5KJP@skynet.simkin.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
On Thursday 04 May 2017 14:21:00 John R Pierce wrote:
> or EBS, and I've heard from more than a few people that EBS can be
> something of a sand trap.
>

Sorry for following up off-topic, but EBS has actually improved considerably
in the last few years. You can get guaranteed (and very high) IOPS on SSD
storage, and many instance types come with high-speed throughput to EBS. It's
much much better for databases than it was 5 years ago.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?