Re: WAL fsync scheduling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Date
Msg-id 5833.974571572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL fsync scheduling  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WAL fsync scheduling  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: WAL fsync scheduling  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>>>> how about sigpause, and using SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to wake them up ? 

> The standard is sigsuspend:

OK, we can probably assume that at least one of sigsuspend or sigpause
is available everywhere.  Now all you need is a free signal number.
Unfortunately we're already using both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL fsync scheduling