Re: problem with partitioned table and indexed json field - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: problem with partitioned table and indexed json field
Date
Msg-id 5798.1383848660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problem with partitioned table and indexed json field  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: problem with partitioned table and indexed json field
List pgsql-general
I wrote:
> It looks like the problem is we're building a MergeAppend plan and not
> getting the targetlist for the MergeAppend node right.

Found it --- simple oversight in building optimized min/max plans.
If you need a patch now, see
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=patch;h=5d0731da521f090f80ea39529fe274ac6d6bffa1

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Ross
Date:
Subject: Re: After upgrade to 9.3, streaming replication fails to start--SOLVED
Next
From: Greg Burek
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it advisable to pg_upgrade directly from 9.0 to 9.3?