> On 05/09/2016 01:58 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> So this is probably just highlighting how I'm not up to date on the
>> -advocacy discussion :) But I thought the idea was to have it
>> integrated, and that *that* was "the product" in this case. As in the
>> "breaker that makes it possible to do transparent upgrades without
>> external products". Which I thought was the target for next release, not
>> this release. But I may be confusing multiple discussion, and as such
>> contributing to the confusion.
>
> Yeah, there's multiple discussions, at least 2:
>
> 1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*?
>
> 2. Is pglogical a major-version-making feature?
>
In my opinion when we have a visual environment full amdinistración
included in the core, will be version 10 while not.
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba
