Re: Very slow INFORMATION_SCHEMA - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Very slow INFORMATION_SCHEMA
Date
Msg-id 5792.1210035386@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very slow INFORMATION_SCHEMA  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> writes:
> I can confirm this for a quite larger result set (4020 rows) for a DB
> with 410 tables and a lot of foreign key constraints.
> ...
> This is Postgresql 8.2.4, on a Dual-Core XEON 3.6GHz. With nested_loops
> off, I get a very fast response (330ms).

FWIW, it looks like 8.3 is significantly smarter about this example
--- it's able to push the toplevel conditions on CONSTRAINT_SCHEMA
and CONSTRAINT_TYPE down inside the UNION, where 8.2 fails to do so.

Which is not to say that there's not more left to do on optimizing
the information_schema views.  In this particular case, for example,
I wonder why the UNION in INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS isn't a
UNION ALL.  There's probably a lot more such micro-optimizations that
could be done if anyone was motivated to look at it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: RAID 10 Benchmark with different I/O schedulers (was: Performance increase with elevator=deadline)
Next
From: Justin
Date:
Subject: need to speed up query