On 07/07/2016 01:10 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:52 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>> In light of the above, it is perfectly reasonable to require, at least
>> temporarily, setting up duplicate storage, or another node.
> pg_upgrade does that, kinda. I'd like to have something better, but
> in the absence of that, I think it's quite wrong to think about
> deprecating it, even if we had logical replication fully integrated
> into core today. Which we by no means do.
I would much rather see more brain power put into pg_upgrade or in place
upgrades than logical replication (as a upgrade solution).
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
