Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed
Date
Msg-id 5770.1416582364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes:
> There is also the possibility to add syntax like this:
> CREATE OR REPLACE [FORCE] FUNCTION ...
> What do you think about that?  It would protect the casual user but allow
> the expert to do it anyway.

I don't see any great attraction to that.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: RLS with check option - surprised design
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: superuser() shortcuts