Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikita Glukhov
Subject Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Date
Msg-id 576df7db-f0a3-1c96-5dec-a566a473cb35@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 29.11.2018 18:24, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:41 PM Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>>
>> Attached 3rd version of the patches rebased onto the current master.
>>
>> Changes from the previous version:
>> - Added support of INCLUDE columns to get_index_column_opclass() (1st patch).
>> - Added parallel kNN scan support.
>> - amcanorderbyop() was transformed into ammatchorderby() which takes a List of
>>    PathKeys and checks each of them with new function match_orderbyop_pathkey()
>>    extracted from match_pathkeys_to_index().  I think that this design can be
>>    used in the future to support a mix of ordinary and order-by-op PathKeys,
>>    but I am not sure.
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, the patch has some conflicts, could you rebase it? In the
> meantime I'll move it to the next CF, hoping to have more reviewers for this
> item.

Attached 4th version of the patches rebased onto the current master.

-- 
Nikita Glukhov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Arthur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: Add extension options to control TAP and isolation tests
Next
From: Alexander Kuzmenkov
Date:
Subject: Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears