can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From t.dalpozzo@gmail.com
Subject can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s
Date
Msg-id 576EAF26.8080508@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s  (Imre Samu <pella.samu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,
I've postgres 9.5.3 installed on win7 64 bit, and ubuntu 16.04tls 64
bit,  same SSD (evo 850 pro) , two different partitions. Laptop is 3.8Ghz.
I've in each partition a simple database with one table called data256
with one column of 256 char.
I wrote a program using libpq which:
1 connects to 127.0.0.1 to the server
2 drops and recreates the table;
3 executes 2000 times the exec() function with the command  "INSERT INTO
data256 VALUES ('AAAAAA...... 250 times')"
I want to commit after every insert of course.
The program is the same both in win and linux; in ansi c, so it's portable.

Performance:
Win7: 8000 write/sec
Linux: 419 write/sec

I don't figure out why such a difference. Also what should I expect?
Which one is reasonable?

I compared the two postgresql.conf, they're identical (except obvious
things), they're the default ones, I didn't touch them. I just tried to
disable ssl in one because it was set but nothing changes.
I didn't go into deeper analysis because the source C file used for test
is the same and the two postgresql.conf are identical.

Then, in order to test write / flush without postgres, I made another C
program, to open a file in writing, and for 1000 times : write 256 bytes
and flush them (using fsync in linux and FlushFileBuffers in win).
Win7: 200 write/sec
Linux: 100 write/sec




Thanks
Pupillo












pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't get two index scans
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s