Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?
Date
Msg-id 57682DAB.8080504@2ndquadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?  (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?  (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 20/06/16 17:25, Melvin Davidson wrote:
>>And you haven't read Vik's reply. :)
>
> Yes I have. Vacuum wll not lock all tables at once, only the ones it is
> currently working on, so the planner may have a slight delay,
> but it will not be gigantic.

I think you should try it.

> I have proposed a reasonable solution to solve the problem in it's
> entirety. Do you have a better one?

You mean by partitioning?  That doesn't really solve any problem, except
that vacfull-ing a partition should be faster than doing the whole
enchilada.
--
Vik Fearing                                          +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full: alternatives?
Next
From: Melvin Davidson
Date:
Subject: Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?