-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> #2 is solved by my previous comments about giving the CFM/C the
> authority. -Core could do that, they are in charge of release.
I don't think authority is the solution. Or certainly not one that
would work with an open source project like ours. What *would*
work is to identify and fix the friction points that prevent
people from joining, make the work harder than it needs to be,
and makes people stop reviewing? I could quickly identify a handful
of things, primarily among them the awful link-to-the-archives
to gather up all the patches process. We have git, let's use it
as it was intended.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201412141011
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlSNqK8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiewwCffAxv8xSZEyLWFz/b2+PxXOXS
xB4An2ubr7ovELtFMKZOZCsFHQAyVca4
=S6ZQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
