Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh berkus
Subject Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Date
Msg-id 574DDA26.8050104@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/31/2016 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> One more consistency question: what's the effect of running out of
>> max_parallel_workers?
> 
> ITYM max_worker_processes (ie, the cluster-wide pool size)?

Yes.  Sorry for contributing to the confusion.  Too many
similar-sounding parameter names.


-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Next
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Logic behind parallel default? WAS: Rename max_parallel_degree?