Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication
Date
Msg-id 5746.1455500723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> Why do we need pg_shadow or pg_user or related views at all..?

A lot of code looks at those just to get usernames.  I am not in favor of
breaking such stuff without need.

How about we just say that the password in these old views always reads
out as '********' even when there is a password, and we invent new views
that carry real auth information?  (Hopefully in an extensible way.)
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication