Re: A configure.in patch check (fwd) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: A configure.in patch check (fwd)
Date
Msg-id 5744.1030287302@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to A configure.in patch check (fwd)  ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>)
Responses Re: A configure.in patch check (fwd)  ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes:
> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for default superuser reserved number of connections])
> + PGAC_ARG_REQ(with, reservedbackends, [  --with-reservedbackends=N    set default superuser reserved number of
connections[2]],
 
> +              [],
> +              [with_reservedbackends=2])

This will be rejected anyway; what you want is to set up
reserved_backends as a GUC parameter, not as something that has to be
hard-wired at configure time.  I can't see any reason to make it
hard-wired...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 7.2.2: Security Release
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Are "text" strings 0 terminated internally?