Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh berkus
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id 573641D2.5000204@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: 10.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: 10.0  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/13/2016 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I still don't like that much, and just thought of another reason why:
> it would foreclose doing two major releases per year.  We have debated
> that sort of schedule in the past.  While I don't see any reason to
> think we'd try to do it in the near future, it would be sad if we
> foreclosed the possibility by a poor choice of versioning scheme.

Well, we have done two major releases in a year before, mostly due to
one release being late and the succeeding one being on time.

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0