Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Date
Msg-id 5723.1278511874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> Stop me if I'm all wrong already, but I though we said that we should
> handle this case by decoupling what we can send to the standby and what
> it can apply.

What's the point of that?  It won't make the standby apply any faster.
What it will do is make the protocol more complicated, hence slower
(more messages) and more at risk of bugs.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: multibyte-character aware support for function "downcase_truncate_identifier()"
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers