Kunshchikov Vladimir wrote:
> Hello Alvaro, thanks for the feedback, fixed all of your points.
> Attached new version of patch.
Looks great -- it's a lot smaller than the original even. One final
touch -- see cfread(), where we have an #ifdef where we test for
fp->compressedfp; the "#else" branch uses the same code as the
!fp->compressedfp. I think your get_cfp_error can be written more
simply using that form. (Also, your version probably errors or warns
about "code before declaration" in that routine, which is not allowed in
C89.)
--
Álvaro Herrera
https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
