Re: Choosing parallel_degree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Date
Msg-id 570E8E32.6090103@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Choosing parallel_degree  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Choosing parallel_degree  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13/04/2016 19:17, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Julien Rouhaud
> <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 22:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2016 17:44, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> We should probably add the number of workers actually obtained to the
>>>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.  That's been requested before.
>>>
>>> If it's not too late for 9.6, it would be very great.
>>
>> Just in case I attach a patch to implement it. I'll add it to the next
>> commitfest.
>
> I think we should go with "Workers Planned" and "Workers Launched",
> capitalized exactly that way, and lose "Number Of".
>

Fixed

> I would be inclined to view this as a reasonable 9.6 cleanup of
> parallel query, but other people may wish to construe things more
> strictly than I would.
>

FWIW, I also see it as a reasonable cleanup.

--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow Pin/UnpinBuffer to operate in a lockfree manner.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd system-column handling in postgres_fdw join pushdown patch