Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id 570BE57C.8080607@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 04/11/2016 10:46 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> Doesn't match my experience at all. The vast majority of my customers
> refer to it by version number.
>
>     Also, considering Ubuntu is by far the largest used Linux distro, I
>     am not sure how much of that is happening in practice.
>
>
> Also very different from my experience. Outside things like docker
> (which most people don't run postgres on - yet?), redhat/centos is
> significantly bigger with my customers.

I should clarify:

When dealing with bare metal -- by far our customer base is
RedHat/CentOS. When dealing with anything cloud, it is by far Debian or
Ubuntu.

>
> Just as a point of input - clearly our customers fall in fairly
> significantly different groups,and we need to be able to deal with both.
>

Absolutely.

>
>     I should note that I am not suggesting we forgo version names but
>     adding something that is fun could be useful... Something to think
>     about.
>
>
>
> FWIW, I believe redhat also has such "code names". Except really
> *nobody* use them there...

True.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                         +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Next
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0