On 4/7/16 1:54 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think that's a pretty hand-wavy statement until the problems have
> been documented, along with some thought and estimation of potential
> compatible work-arounds.
>
>
> By hand-wavy, you mean not fully worked out? Yes, neither the pros and
> cons have been worked out in detail, so opposing the idea is on the same
> shaky ground. How then to proceed?
Do we even have a list of things we'd like to do that would break
compatibility? I haven't seen one...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
