On 29/03/16 03:06, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>> OK, sounds good.
>>
>> Just a side-note. Andres has pushed the fix for the GinIs* macros as
>> af4472bc, making patch 0003 from the last series useless now.
>
> I'm not prepared to get very involved in this patch series since I am
> not a Windows guy, but I went ahead and pushed 0001 anyway. I'm not
> sure that we want to commit 0002 without a BF machine. Can anybody
> help with that?
>
I have machine ready, waiting for animal name and secret. It will
obviously fail until we push the 0002 and 0004 though.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
