Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Date
Msg-id 56F5899C.7060808@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums  ("Matt Wilmas" <pgsql_lists@realplain.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 03/24/2016 12:40 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
> (I notice the btree_gin docs don't mention "numeric," but it works.)
>


Numeric does work - we have regression tests to prove it, do we should 
fix the docs. But I'm also curious to know why apparently we don't have 
distance operator support for numeric.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Alter or rename enum value
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Alter or rename enum value