Re: Partitioning and ORM tools - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Date
Msg-id 56F1F631.9040508@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning and ORM tools  (CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 3/22/2016 2:20 PM, CS DBA wrote:
>> I would think the ORM (as yet undefined) would want to think in terms
>> of the parent table and not know about the physical schema details.
>> Can  the client not be written to check only for errors vs checking
>> for non-zero inserts?
>>
>>
>>
> That was our first suggestion, they don;t want to make any app changes

so they want someone else to make major architectural changes. great.



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Manuel Kniep
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Next
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning and ORM tools