Partition - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Leonardo M. Ramé
Subject Partition
Date
Msg-id 56EBD0A6.3000300@griensu.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Partition
Re: Partition
List pgsql-general
Hi, I have read and re-read the Partitioning chapter
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/ddl-partitioning.html), but I
still don't see how to implement this use case:

One table storing current data, let's call it the "master table", then
one or more partitions with old data.

For example, the master table is this:

     create table log(
       idlog serial not null,
       date_time timestamp not null default now(),
       log varchar(255),
       primary key(idlog)
     );

The documentation says the master table should be empty, then a trigger
must evaluate a condition, the date_time field for example, and insert
the data in the corresponding table. This is a *rare* condition, because
in the log example, new content is created without knowing its date and
time in advance. For example:

     insert into log(log) values('log this please.');

The date_time column will set the now() value.

Now, by following the example, to create a child table I'll do

     create table log_old( ) inherits (log);

This raises the 1nst question, how can I define a *dynamic* check,
for checking older than X days?. Is this possible?.

An idea (didn't test):

     check (date_time::date < now()::date - '30 day'::interval)

Then, the trigger, after each insert should *move* old data to log_old.

The only problem I see here is the master table isn't empty, but
contains current data. The question is, will it work as expected?, I
mean when I do "select * from log" I'll get an *union* of new and old data?.

Regards,
--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error: insufficient data in the message
Next
From: otheus uibk
Date:
Subject: Re: How to Qualifying or quantify risk of loss in asynchronous replication